🔗 Share this article

Initially, Donald Trump appeared to adopt a resolute stance regarding Ukraine. Following making warnings of "severe repercussions" last August if Russia's president persisted hindering truce discussions, the former president eventually introduced considerable penalties on the Russian two largest oil companies, Lukoil and Rosneft. This action significantly hindered Putin's ability to finance his war effort in Ukraine.

However, via his latest comprehensive peace initiative for the conflict, that was drafted by both nations' officials without Ukraine's or European participation, he has clearly returned to his favorable to Russia stance.

Favoring Military Action

This initiative would in practice benefit the Russian leader for occupying Ukraine while putting the country's democracy in danger. Despite strong statements that "The nation's sovereignty will be confirmed", much of the proposal in reality weaken that essential independence. Seen as a Moscow's wish would probably be a disaster for Ukraine.

Showing his real-estate background, the former president seems to consider the war as a mere land disagreement, like giving Putin a portion of Ukraine's land will satisfy the president. But, Russia's war is not simply about occupying a destroyed area of economically weakened area in eastern Ukraine. It is about Ukraine's democracy – and Putin's obvious intention to destroy it so it no longer acts as an attractive model for the Russia's population of the accountable governance that his growing autocracy prevents them.

Border Giveaways

Although maintaining in position the already divided oblasts of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, Trump's initiative would compel Ukraine to surrender all of Donetsk province. Beyond favoring the Russian Federation with land that its troops have been unable to capture in over a lengthy period of fighting, this concession would render Ukraine's defensive positions critically compromised.

This region is the place of the nation's highly-touted "fortress belt", the entrenched protective structures that represent a essential impediment to enemy progress. Trump would have Ukraine leave these defenses, leaving Putin a open way to Kyiv should he eventually opt to resume the hostilities.

Defense Reductions

Then, in a step that would make additional fighting more feasible for the Russian military, the plan would mandate the nation to diminish the numbers of its troops from their present large number personnel to a cap of six hundred thousand. Significantly, Trump's proposal places no equivalent limits on Russia's military.

Seemingly as a gesture to Putin's campaign to depict the nation's chosen by the people administration as extremists, the plan asserts: "Every radical ideology and practices must be condemned and banned." As if to highlight this element, it requires that "Ukraine will hold democratic votes in this period" of a ceasefire agreement. At the same time, Trump sets no requirement that Putin risk his authoritarian rule by conducting votes in Russia.

Defense Assurances

Certainly, the plan makes the Russian Federation promise not to "enter neighboring countries" and to "enshrine in law its stance of peaceful relations towards the EU and Ukraine". But taking into account that Putin has violated similar treaties in the previous instances – including the 1994 Budapest memorandum, in which Russia committed to respect the nation's sovereignty in return for relinquishing its former Soviet nuclear arsenal, and the 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, in which Russia agreed to a halt in fighting and a restoration of seized territory in eastern Ukraine to the government – how should the international community trust this commitment now?

This explains Ukraine has been so insistent on international protection assurances. While the initiative promises a "strong joint armed reaction" should the Russian Federation restart its military campaign, and provides that "Ukraine will receive strong defense commitments", the particulars include fuzzy to troubling. The proposal would not only deny Ukraine Nato membership but also prevent member states from positioning troops on Ukrainian territory, thus blocking the peacekeeping contingent, likely led by European powers, on which the Ukrainian government had been counting to stop Putin from replenishing his reduced military, restocking, and reinvading.

Global Concern

A separate parallel deal apparently would offer Ukraine with a Nato-style protection assurance, in which any future "major, intentional, and sustained armed attack" by Russia on Ukraine "would be considered as an assault endangering the stability and safety of the Western nations." This indicates a military response. However different from a capable Ukrainian military – the nation's primary deterrent against additional invasion – the credibility of the supplementary deal would rely on the dedication of Nato leaders, such as the US administration, to act with force to Putin's hostilities, an action they have {not